The brand new questionnaire contains step 3 pieces. Area I provided issues out-of socio-market analysis (years, number of education, parity, familial money, occupation, most recent relationship standing, sexual activity, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you will reputation of irregular cervical cancers testing).
Region II comprised of six questions regarding the target ladies who will likely be processed, age to start, frequency, decades or standards to cease of evaluating, and methods out-of tests. Only the professionals who had heard from HPV create go-ahead so you can Area III hence examined knowledge about HPV off its style of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), function of alert and you will avoidance.
Before the analysis, the fresh questionnaire off area II and you will region III into the Thai version was considered, talked about, and changed up until consensus among 20 experts who had been every gynecologic oncologists (some were article writers various other synchronous education). The professionals rated all of 19 concerns as the either ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The item-height Blogs Validity Index (I-CVI) was determined for every item, and the Stuff Authenticity List (CVI) are calculated brightwomen.net hans kommentar er her by taking the common ratio of 14 questions about understanding of cervical malignant tumors assessment and you may 5 questions relating to HPV. The newest CVI was in fact step 1 both for areas of new survey (S1 Dining table). The newest reliability try checked out inside the 30 female with the exact same characteristic given that users. The latest Cronbach’ alpha coefficients to your reliability was 0.819 to own understanding of cervical disease tests and 0.907 for information about HPV.
Research collection
Into the time regarding arranged colposcopy, the research assistant given recommendations of study towards feminine which met addition criteria. The ladies which wanted to take part gave written advised concur and replied this new questionnaire individually on their own prior to proceeding to help you colposcopy.
Research amassed for this study was in fact socio-demographic research (Area We of the survey), experience with cervical disease evaluation (Part II), and you can experience with HPV (Part III).
Mathematical data
The newest solutions of knowledge on cervical cancer tumors evaluation and you will HPV were analyzed from the for each item just before scoring categorization. Proper answer was obtained as step one while ‘completely wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ is obtained 0.
Out of 14 questions out-of cervical disease screening, feminine whose score were ? 10 was basically arbitrarily categorized just like the having ‘an effective knowledge’ normally have been regarded as having “unhealthy training”. For experience with HPV, women whoever answer is ‘never been aware of HPV’ was basically omitted regarding the data out of HPV education.
From 5 issues, women whoever score was indeed ? step three was basically considered as that have ‘a beneficial expertise in HPV’ if not while the ‘not-good knowledge’. From 19 issues, feminine whose score was in fact ? thirteen was indeed categorized since the that have ‘a beneficial full knowledge’ otherwise because the ‘not good complete knowledge’.
Most of the studies have been compiled into the an electronic databases and reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were used to research group study and was indeed summarized once the quantity with payment, mean with basic departure otherwise average that have assortment. Brand new connection anywhere between per variable and you will education get was basically examined playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model is made in multivariable studies including most of the variables potentially associated with the knowledge get. The fresh new felt quantity of analytical benefit are an effective p-property value 0.05 otherwise faster.
Show
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>