Dating between sexting behaviors and you may relevant services

Dating between sexting behaviors and you may relevant services

Investigation was basically analysed playing with SPSS twenty five.0. First descriptive analyses was basically did, and Cronbach’s alphas and wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess associations between sex, years, intimate positioning, that have an intimate/intimate partner, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you may determination to take part in sexting since the independent variables, together with five sexting behaviors while the based variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is regarded as a way of measuring perception size. All the details had been registered into design as well. The research has also been stratified of the sex.

Frequency out of sexting habits

The most prevalent sexting behaviors are becoming (21.2%) and obtaining thru an intermediary (28.4%), followed closely by third-class forwarding from intimate posts (nine.3%) and you will, finally, delivering (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are shown within the Desk dos.

Brand new regression patterns was in fact tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is actually .42 on the “sending” design, .31 towards “receiving” design, .23 to the “third-class forwarding” design, and .17 on “receiving via a mediator” model (Dining table step 3:

Regarding the “sending” design, willingness so you can sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe period [CI]: 5.36-), that have an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: step 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: step one.19-dos.93), intimate direction (OR: step one.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step three.00) and you may years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.14-step one.63) was in fact significantly related to delivering engagement. In the “receiving” design, which have a romantic/intimate partner (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), determination to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), using Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step three.10), gender (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-dos.41), using Snapchat (OR: step one.61; 95% CI: 1.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-1.86) and years (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: 1.12-step 1.41) was basically notably connected with finding wedding.

In the “third-class forwarding” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step 1.16-6.51), readiness to help you sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step 1.48-2.72), gender (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-dos.91), that have an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-2.68), using Facebook (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step 1.87) and you can years (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-step 1.66) was basically somewhat about wedding in the third-cluster forwarding.

From the “choosing through a mediator” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.step 16; 95% CI: 1.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-2.24), that have an intimate/sexual partner (OR: 1.7step 1; 95% CI: step one.35-2.17), gender (OR: step one.4step 1; 95% CI: 1.1step one-1.80) and you will ages (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-1.49) have been notably esposa Europa del Este pertaining to involvement in the getting via an intermediary.

Gender distinctions

The fresh new regression designs were high. Nagelkerke’s R 2 try .50 for girls and you may .41 to possess guys towards the “sending” model; .31 for females and you may .29 to have guys to your “receiving” model; .18 for females and you may .24 for guys toward “third-class forwarding” model; and you may .14 for females and .twenty two for guys to the “researching through a mediator” design (Table 4:

About “sending” design, for girls, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and you can years (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-dos.20) was basically notably about giving wedding. Having people, these were desire to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-9.94), having a romantic/sexual companion (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step 1.32-4.29).

Regarding “receiving” design, for women, readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), with a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: step 1.13-2.33) and you may years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: step one.step one7-1.72) were significantly pertaining to acquiring engagement. To have boys, they were with a romantic/sexual lover (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: dos.08-4.25), willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-step three.41), using Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step one.86) and you will age (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 1.38).

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *