Research had been analysed having fun with SPSS twenty five.0. Earliest descriptive analyses had been performed, and Cronbach’s alphas and you can wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate contacts anywhere between intercourse, age, intimate positioning, having an intimate/sexual lover, SNS put, sexting normalisation and you can willingness to engage in sexting because separate parameters, as well as the four sexting behaviours while the mainly based parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is thought to be a way of measuring feeling dimensions. The variables was joined on model on the other hand. The research was also stratified of the intercourse.
Frequency regarding Ruso chicas para el matrimonio sexting behaviors
The most frequent sexting behaviors are getting (21.2%) and obtaining through an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), with third-party forwarding off sexual posts (nine.3%) and, finally, giving (8.1%). Descriptive analytics are offered for the Table 2.
New regression designs was significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are .42 with the “sending” design, .30 with the “receiving” model, .23 towards “third-cluster forwarding” model, and you can .17 on the “choosing thru a mediator” design (Dining table step three:
About “sending” design, readiness to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust interval [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate direction (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step three.00) and you may decades (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: 1.step one4-step 1.63) was in fact rather pertaining to delivering wedding. About “receiving” design, which have an enchanting/sexual companion (OR: step three.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), readiness so you can sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step 3.10), sex (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.6step 1; 95% CI: 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step 1.86) and you may years (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: step one.12-1.41) was rather pertaining to researching wedding.
Regarding the “third-cluster forwarding” model, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-6.51), desire in order to sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: 1.32-2.91), that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), playing with Myspace (OR: step one.53; 95% CI: step one.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step one.09-step 1.87) and you may decades (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-step one.66) was basically rather regarding engagement for the 3rd-party forwarding.
Regarding “receiving thru an intermediary” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.step 16; 95% CI: step one.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: 1.5dos-dos.24), with an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), gender (OR: step one.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.step 1step one-step one.80) and age (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step 1.49) have been notably pertaining to engagement inside the getting thru an intermediary.
Gender variations
The brand new regression activities were significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 try .50 for females and .41 to have people on the “sending” model; .30 for girls and you may .30 to have people towards “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you will .twenty-four getting people towards the “third-cluster forwarding” model; and you may .14 for females and .22 for men into the “getting through a mediator” design (Desk cuatro:
Regarding the “sending” model, for girls, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/sexual companion (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-nine.09) and you can many years (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) have been somewhat pertaining to giving engagement. To have boys, they were desire to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-9.94), which have an intimate/sexual partner (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-cuatro.88) and making use of Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
On “receiving” design, for women, willingness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), which have an intimate/intimate lover (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-2.33) and you will many years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.step one7-step one.72) had been notably related to acquiring involvement. To own guys, these people were which have an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-4.25), willingness to help you sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: 1.58-3.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step 1.86) and decades (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-1.38).