Analysis had been analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. Basic detailed analyses was did, as well as Cronbach’s alphas and wavelengths. Digital logistic regressions were used to assess relationships ranging from sex, decades, sexual orientation, that have a romantic/intimate companion, SNS put, sexting normalisation and you may willingness to engage in sexting given that independent parameters, and also the four sexting habits once the built variables. Nagelkerke’s R dos try considered as a measure of effect dimensions. The variables was basically registered towards the design while doing so. The research was also stratified because of the sex.
Frequency from sexting behaviors
The most widespread sexting behaviors are receiving (21.2%) and getting through a mediator (twenty-eight.4%), followed closely by 3rd-team forwarding away from sexual articles (9.3%) and you can, finally, giving (8.1%). Descriptive statistics receive in the Desk 2.
The newest regression designs was indeed extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is .42 toward “sending” design, .30 to the “receiving” model, .23 to the “third-class forwarding” model, and you may .17 on “searching through a mediator” model (Desk 3:
posta sipariЕџi Slovakya eЕџleri
Regarding “sending” model, desire so you’re able to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe interval [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/sexual companion (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: step one.19-dos.93), sexual positioning (OR: step one.77; 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and you can age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14-step one.63) was in fact rather linked to giving involvement. On “receiving” design, which have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), readiness in order to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step three.10), gender (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step one.6step 1; 95% CI: step 1.21-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.20-1.86) and you may age (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step one2-step 1.41) was basically somewhat related to researching wedding.
On “third-party forwarding” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step 1.1six-six.51), desire so you’re able to sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-2.91), having a romantic/intimate companion (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.29-2.68), playing with Fb (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-1.87) and you can age (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step one.66) was somewhat regarding involvement in the 3rd-group forwarding.
Throughout the “choosing through an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.step one6; 95% CI: 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.52-2.24), that have an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: step one.71; 95% CI: step one.35-dos.17), gender (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: step 1.step 1step one-step 1.80) and you may years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-1.49) was in fact significantly related to engagement for the choosing through a mediator.
Intercourse differences
The newest regression activities were extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos was .fifty for females and you may .41 having people toward “sending” model; .29 for females and you will .31 to own guys to your “receiving” model; .18 for women and .twenty-four getting boys to your “third-cluster forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for girls and you will .22 for guys into “researching via an intermediary” model (Table 4:
About “sending” model, for women, determination so you can sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have an intimate/intimate partner (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you may years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) was indeed somewhat associated with delivering involvement. To own males, they certainly were desire to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-9.94), which have an intimate/sexual companion (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and making use of Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step 1.32-cuatro.29).
Throughout the “receiving” design, for women, readiness in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), having an intimate/sexual lover (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and you may ages (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.17-1.72) was notably about finding involvement. To possess men, they were having a romantic/intimate lover (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), readiness in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step one.86) and years (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: step one.04-1.38).