Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Losing weight restraint is measured of the Diet Scale of your own Restaurants Thinking Take to (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of 16 comments scored towards the a 6-section size (never = 0/always = 5), which have large score demonstrating a sophisticated off controlled dinner. Toward Consume psychometrical characteristics pick Gather mais aussi al. (1982). The newest feel coefficient for both products, this new Mexican and you may Italian language of them, is actually of the same really worth, an alpha out-of 0.76.
Weight-loss restraint
Ineffectiveness size. The fresh new bad apply at factor was estimated from the Ineffectiveness Level out of the fresh new Dining Disorders Catalog (EDI) (Gather mais aussi al., 1983), that has shown an effective convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) out of R = 0.70 (p
Medical staff grabbed the extra weight and you may height actions
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are calculated because pounds in the kilograms split of the top inside rectangular meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Just before analysis collection, a great airplane pilot study of new Silhouettes Measure (Figure step 1), placed on a sample consisting of 20 North american country children, was used to evaluate the fresh appropriateness of the figures so you can show muscles brands, in order to validate a acceptation out of an unfamiliar group of silhouettes and you will a very clear understanding of the latest instructions (this new Italian language classification currently counted which have analysis within esteem). The outcomes displayed the new Outline Size are good otherwise an enthusiastic compatible means into North american country attempt.
The latest investigators of the two regions, on Mexico Area as well as Hae (standardized) techniques. The newest surveys were applied to categories of scientific and you may nursing pupils at North american country and you will German colleges. One reason why behind the newest ples off pupils linked to medication are precisely the appeal one (one can suppose) these teenagers must have with the medical industry as well as illnesses, which makes them more attentive to dilemmas including ED. Told agree was taken from all of the analysis participants. Every contacted college students provided to engage. The brand new respective regional stability committees acknowledged this new non-invasive procedure. Elite translators undertook and you will managed brand new interpretation and you may retranslation of tools.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20 sitios de novias de orden de correo eslavo superior.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for